Designing Hybrid Instruction
Critique Criteria

Below is a list of criteria that can be used to evaluate instruction. In YOUR critiques, you do not have to use all of these criteria, and you may also add criteria of your own.

1. What (if any) is the Enduring Understanding of this lesson? Is it explicitly stated?
   
   
2. Is it explicitly stated how this lesson is relevant to the students' lives or careers?
   
   
3. How is the lesson made interesting to the specific target audience?
   
   
4. What prerequisite knowledge or skills are necessary to this lesson? Are they explicitly stated? Are there links to resources that could provide instruction on those prerequisites?
   
   
5. In what ways is this lesson adapted for students of different learning styles?
   
   
6. Do the objectives match what you'd consider to be the desired outcomes of the lesson? Are they explicitly and clearly stated?
   
   
7. Do the objectives include any of Bloom's higher cognitive levels? If not, could they have been included? How?
   
   
8. Do the objectives include Wiggins and McTighe's Empathy, Perspective, or Self-Knowledge? If not, could they have been included? How?
   
   
9. Is the Assignment appropriate for the stated objectives? How could it have been improved?
   
   
10. Is the Delivery Mode appropriate for the stated objectives? What other modes might have been used?
    
    
11. In what ways would this lesson have been appropriate for hybrid delivery? What parts of the lesson would have been in class, online, or video-based?
    
    
12. In what ways could this lesson have been approved?
    
    
13. What were the strengths of this lessons?
    
    
14. What elements of this lesson would be applicable to your course?